Before Dennis Villeneuve’s 2021 version of “Dune,” there was a 1984 film with similarities and differences. PHOTO CREDIT: imbd.com
Many avid moviegoers went to see “Dune” open in theaters this past October. However, not many people are aware that this film has a predecessor from the year 1984.
Both movies were based on the well-loved science fiction book series from the 1960s which shares the same name. “Dune” (2021) and “Dune” (1984) have both captivated loyal followings for various reasons. Firstly, these movies feature all-star casts, large budgets, strong marketing campaigns and boast beautiful visual styles and cinematography.
Though they were based on the same source material, these films are almost polar opposites. Only one of these films has been labelled as a success. “Dune” (1984) was a box office failure of spectacular scope and an embarrassment for Universal Pictures. So what happened?
“Dune” (2021) had many advantages over “Dune” (1984) right out of the gate. It was directed by Denis Villeneuve, who already has science fiction box office hits under his belt, such as “Blade Runner 2049” (2017) and “Arrival” (2016). The 1984 adaptation was directed by well-loved experimental filmmaker David Lynch. This is the only large box office film he has ever directed, but he had already released successful independent films “The Elephant Man” (1980) and “Eraserhead” (1977). The strong presence of his style does not benefit large box office productions in terms of profit as the experimental, and often confusing, directing choices are likely to leave a mainstream audience baffled. “Dune” (2021) did not have this problem. Some film-lovers will argue that this adaptation feels lifeless, corporate and lacking in style compared to the previous “Dune” film, however, many critics see this as a benefit. The plot is much clearer for general audiences, and the actors give much more convincing performances.
Despite its director, the 1984 version had other methods for drawing audiences into theaters. It featured a compelling soundtrack, composed and performed by the popular rock band Toto, known today by their hit song “Africa.” It also featured an all-star cast, featuring Kyle MacLachlan, Francesca Annis and Patrick Stewart to name a few. It even featured another famous musician of the era, known by his stage name Sting. There were also many attempts to create merchandise for this film in anticipation for its success, including Dune Trading Cards. As you already know, this was not enough for “Dune” (1984) to be profitable.
“Dune” (2021) featured talented and well-liked actors, and had a score composed by the legendary Hans Zimmer, who has worked on soundtracks for such films as “Pirates of the Caribbean – At World’s End” (2007), “The Lion King” (1994) and “The Dark Knight” (2008). As far as I can tell, this movie is not intended to become heavily merchandised, and unfortunately no trading card game has been created (yet). This is interpreted by some fans of “Dune” (1984) to be evidence of it having less charm.
Fans of “Dune” (1984) will tell you that it is a beautiful example of a 1980s science fiction movie, with a dated appearance, soundtrack and performances. They admire Lynch’s ambition and integrity to maintain his style under the pressure of creating a big-budget box office production. This version is also preferred by many people who have read the book series, because they see it as almost an abstracted version of the literary universe. Fans of this film will also admire the rarity and uniqueness of such a film.
Fans of the 2021 adaptation will cite the beautiful special effects and cinematography, the strong acting performances and a beautiful soundtrack as reasons they enjoyed it. The universe and characters are also well established.
I would recommend watching both versions of “Dune” to form your own opinion. Personally, I’m a big fan of both, but for very different reasons. And yes, I own a few Dune Trading Cards.